Bitches on the Bench - An Update - A Liar Does What A Liar Does When A Liar is Caught in Her Lie.

Liar Liz Bennett

One thing about liars is that they are predictable. 

When a liar is caught telling a lie, the liar will either deny it was a lie or avoid dealing with it. 

When an honest person, a person of integrity and decent character, makes a mistake and the mistake is brought to their attention, an honest person, a person of integrity and decent character, will examine the mistake carefully, reflect on it and, if they were genuinely wrong, admit it, apologize and make amends.

People make mistakes every day.

There is no shame in it in making an honest mistake, provided no one is harmed.

However, when a liar tells a lie and he or she is caught in it and the lie is fundamental to his or her position, then he or she is in deep trouble. To admit making a lie is to forfeit everything, career, position as a judge, credibility, dignity, respect from one's peers and ultimately self respect.

A liar can deny it but, if the truth is obvious, as it is in the case of the lies told by British Columbia Court of Appeal Justices Elizabeth Bennett, Mary Saunders and Nicole Garson in their scandalously fraudulent judgment given in the case of Gregory N. Harney Law Corporation v Aggleland Holdings Inc and others, then the liar will usually engage in what psychologists call "avoidance coping".

In psychology, avoidance coping, escape coping, or cope and avoid is a maladaptive coping mechanism characterized by the effort to avoid dealing with a stressor. Coping refers to behaviors that attempt to protect oneself from psychological damage.

Liar Niki Garson

So when John English detected what he thought was a deliberate lie in the judgement of British Columbia Court of Appeal Justices Elizabeth Bennett, Mary Saunders and Nicole Garson made July 17, 2016, he applied to court for a  reconsideration based on what was a clear error of fact in the reasons for judgment.

In response, if the judges had been honest people, persons of integrity and decent character, they would have examined the allegation of a mistake carefully, reflected on it and written about it in their reasons for judgment on the reconsideration motion for all the world to see what it was they had been mistaken upon and, if the mistake was incidental and of no consequence then the judgment would not change and the public would have confidence in their judgment but, if the mistake was fundamental, then they would change the judgment and, again, the public would have confidence in their judgment.  

Click here to read the 8 paragraph judgment issued September 28, 2016 on the reconsideration motion and notice that the facts Mr. English claims are incorrect are never referred to. 

Remember, that Mr. English is claiming that the amended account was not delivered and served as the judges originally wrote in paragraph 44 of their first judgment.

Click here to read paragraph 44 of the original judgment made June 17, 2016

Unfortunately, British Columbia Court of Appeal Justices Elizabeth Bennett, Mary

Liar Mary Saunders

Saunders and Nicole Garson did not do what one expects of honest people,  persons of integrity and decent character, and instead they engaged in classic "avoidance conduct" by issuing new reasons for judgment that avoid any reference to the actual mistake of fact thereby proving that their judgment is a fraud and that they are under probably threat and intimidation by British Columbia Investment Management Corporation or some other very powerful group of persons - perhaps, even, the provincial cabinet of Premier Christy Clark.

The whole sorry story emerges because British Columbia Investment Management Corporation wants this property, it got this property for pennies on the dollar at an unfair rigged and crooked court sale and they, the Board of Directors, think they don't have to return it to its rightful owners because they are ABOVE THE LAW - and, for now, they are right.      


English Family Resort Property

This is because BCIMC controls $150 billion in public service pension funds and someone burned down the English family home so BCIMC could get control of the English family property -



English Family Home Burning

 
And someone tried to burn down the business office the same day to get control of the property BCIMC wanted. It was the same day someone burned the pump house but we don't have a photo for that.  But three fires, in one day, are no co-incidence.   



English Family Resort Business Office Burnt on Same Day As Their Home

And British Columbia's responsible politicians refuse to act to rectify a wrong caused by out of control public servants and the probable reason for their inaction is that they stand to benefit from the crimes committed because those crimes have enriched their own pension plans.


Deputy Premier Rich Coleman

And Attorney General Suzanne Anton shows her colours at a local hot spot

Suzanne Anton in the middle with the girls (?)

And, so, although our fathers and grandfathers and, yes, our grandmothers and mothers, too, died and were injured fighting the Nazis Gangsters in WW2, they did so for nothing because our government has become a gang of Nazi Gangsters who burn and loot property and throws their victims to their graves just like the Nazis did.  



A Family Victimized by the State
Welcome to British Columbia, Canada.

 

 

THE BITCHES ON THE BENCH - Corrupt BC Court of Appeal Turns Blind Eye To Evidence of Crimes By Lawyer Greg Harney

Greg Harney

The "bitches on the bench" at the British Columbia Court of Appeal have soiled the reputation Court, again, by finding in favour of lawyer Greg Harney in his million dollar fee dispute fee  with the English family and their holding companies that he briefly represented when the Government of British Columbia and its agents used terrorism and other crimes to loot the English family property at fire sale prices after agents of the Government started the fires and used other criminal tactics to cheat the English family and steal their property.

The corrupt panel of three judges at the Court of  Appeal turned a blind eye to clear evidence of fraud and fabrication of evidence by Victoria lawyer Greg Harney.

Experienced lawyers say the bill should have been between $10,000 and $25,000 so why did the bitches on the bench allow this Travesty of Justice to stand especially when there was evidence of criminal activity in the proceedings by the lawyer in order to advance his case. 

The Editors believe that insiders with the Government of British Columbia blackmailed or threatened the three judges, Elizabeth Bennett, Mary Saunders and Nicole Garson because that is the only plausible reason the judges would go against the law that clearly favoured Mr. English and his family companies and reject the new evidence that Mr. English had uncovered that proved that lawyer Greg Harney, or someone acting on his behalf, fabricated false evidence that he used to persuade the lower court judge, Master Peter Keighley, to grant a judgment against the English family for $220,000 in what was clearly a corrupt billing practice.



Bitch Liz Bennett

The allegation that Elizabeth Bennett would succumb to blackmail or some other threat is easy to believe because Elizabeth has a clear track record of benefitting criminal insiders with the British Columbia Government and was appointed a judge after a career with the British Columbia Crown prosecution service where, our sources report, she was part of their crooked pedofile cover up squad of lawyers protecting some of British Columbia's dirtiest sexual perverts and child abusers that included a number of government employees including some judges and prominent lawyers.

Click here to read blog dedicated to corruption by Bitch Judge Liz Bennett

 It is believed that Bennett will profit from the decision because of her pension plan investments that are managed by British Columbia Investment Management Corporation the company that profited from the crimes carried out against the English family.



Bitch Mary Saunders

The allegation against Justice Mary Saunders is also believable because she Campney and Murphy that dissolved after its major client Eron Mortgage was caught in a "massive fraud" where thousands of investors investors lost an estimated $182 million..Saunders was appointed in 1992 by Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and Justice Minister Kim Campbell both of whom had a reputation for appointing criminals and sleaze bags to the court.  

Harney initially sent Mr. English a $1million dollar bill for a couple of days of court work and, according to English, pretending to look for alternate financing. 

Harney then used threats of legal proceedings if English did not immediately approve the bill which is a form of extortion and a criminal offence in Canada but the bitches n the court, Mary Liz and Nicole, felt that was just fine which means that other lawyers can rely on this ugly precedent to act in a similar manner against unsuspecting citizens and get away with it. Welcome to British Columbia and its ridiculously crooked court system.

Knowing that his initial bill was "an act of obvious insanity", Harney then sent a revised bill for $550,000 and commenced a lawsuit to collect the grossly inflated second bill.

The initial hearing was before Master Peter Keighley who is suspected to be part of the Freemason criminal gang that operates inside the British Columbia court system and that was part of the crimes carried out against the English family. 


Bitch Niki Garson

Keighley first came to the editors attention due to his role in the destruction of British Columbia lawyer Karl Eisbrenner where Keighley presided over a Kangaroo court that relied upon a fraudulent psychiatric report craftily devised by a fraudulent psychiatrist to label Mr. Eisbrenner as delusional and disbar him because Eisbrenner was working on a law case that might have destroyed the career of yet to be elected BC Premier Gordon Campbell. Campbell.

Click here to read more about the case of Karl Eisbrenner.

Keighley should never have presided on the Harney v English case case because he is an employee of the BC Government, he is not a judge, and he had an indirect financial interest in the outcomebecause of her pension plan investments that are managed by British Columbia Investment Management Corporation the company that profited from the crimes carried out against the English family a fact that did not become apparent to the English family until many months after the hearing but that Keighly knew about from the day he entered the courtroom.

EVIDENCE OF FABRICATION OF EVIDENCE (From the Factum)

1.        After the hearing before the Registrar and the Chambers Judge, the appellants discovered that the respondents had not delivered and served the Appointment “with the bill attached” upon the appellants as required by the Legal Profession Act and the respondents had improperly entered in the court record the altered backdated bill that was subsequently relied upon by the Registrar without proper delivery or service. 

2.        The admission of the new evidence of the improper use of the altered back dated bill and the failure to comply with the mandatory procedures of the Legal Profession Act with respect to delivery and service of the bill satisfies tests of relevance, reliability and reasonable likelihood of effecting the outcome of the hearings because this evidence goes directly to jurisdiction and raises the a reasonable suspicion of fraud by the respondents that should be addressed and responded to by the Court.

3     The Appointment that commenced the review proceeding before the Registrar under the Legal Profession Act named John English and three corporate entities as respondents, but none of those corporations nor John English were identified as persons charged in the bill that was attached to the Appointment that was used to commence the proceeding contrary to the Legal Profession Act and the Supreme Court Civil Rules.  

          Statement of Facts, paragraph 17 to 19.

          Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c. 9, s.69. and 70.

          Supreme Court Civil Rules, Rule 14-1, (21) and (22). 

          Affidavit 6 of English, CA040838, November 19, 2014, para 6, Exhibit” D”. 

          Affidavit 7 of English, CA040838, February 9, 2015, para 2 to 7, Exhibits “D"

 

4.        The bill that was attached to the Appointment had not been previously delivered to the appellants Angleland, Nederland, Paradise Beach Resorts Inc. or John English contrary to s. 69 (1) of the Legal Profession Act.  

 

Legal Profession Act, SBC, 1998, c.9, s. 69 (1).

Interpretation Act RSBC 1996, c. 238, s. 29.

Statement of Facts, para. 17.

5.        The Appointment with the bill attached was not served upon any of the persons charged with the bill as required by section 70 (4) of the Legal Profession Act and the Supreme Court Civil Rules.

Legal Profession Act, SBC, 1998, c.9, s. 70 (4).

Supreme Court Civil Rules, Rule 14-1, (21) and (22).   

Statement of Facts, para. 19.

6.        The review was carried out by the registrar was on the basis of the altered back dated bill that had never been delivered or served to any of the appellant

Transcript, March13, 2014, p. 23, l.40. to p. 24, l.23.  

Statement of Facts, para. 20 -23.

 

7.        The Registrar did not have jurisdiction to conduct a review of a bill that had not been delivered and served upon the appellants in compliance with Part 8 of the Legal Profession Act.

          Kelly v McMillan, 2003 BCJ, No. 430.     

8.        As a result of the failure of the respondents to comply with the mandatory scheme set out in the Legal Professions Act, the Registrar lacked jurisdiction review the bill, to allow charges and disbursements for any services provided by the respondents to the appellants and to issue the certificates of fees against the appellants.

     Legal Profession Act, SBC [1998], c. 9, Part 8, ss. 64-79

      Kelly v McMillan, 2003 BCJ, No. 430, Goepel, J. 

     Tungohan v Gebara, 2011, BCJ, No. 2145, Registrar Sainty.

A Bad Place To Invest or Seek Justice

 

Click here to read more about Greg Harney

 

Canadian Judicial Council Refuses to Investigate Corruption at the British Columbia Court of Appeal

Political Judge Nicole Garson

When Mr. English and his family were denied their fundamental right to use a lawyer to present legal arguments at the British Columbia Court of Appeal, by Judges Elizabeth Bennett, Mary Saunders and Nicole Garson, all of whom had serious conflicts of interest, especially the notoriously corrupt Elizabeth Bennett who had been a long time British Columbia civil servant, Mr. English, his lawyer, John Carten, and Ms. Karen Gibbs, who was present at the hearing, filed three complaints with the Canadian Judicial Council.

As expected, the Canadian Judicial Council, refused to conduct an investigation thereby proving, once again, that Canada's court system is the among the most corrupt in the world where judges deliberately cheat members of the public in order to benefit friends insiders and their political masters.


The situation in Canada is well known to the outside world but hidden by the government controlled Canadian media, in 2010, when Canada was last assessed, the Global Integrity Report found that the Canadian Justice System is one of the most corrupt in the entire world.

Click here to read The Global Integrity Report on Canada's corrupt judiciary for 2010. 

The situation in Canada has become very bad. 

Norman Sabourin

All Canadian judges must have been lawyers before being appointed by politicians. 

There is no single elected judge in the whole of Canada.

The Canadian Judicial Council, under the day to day direction of CEO and ex-RCMP officer Norman Sabourin, regularly refuses to investigate complaints of mis-conduct by judges, especially allegations of corruption.

No Canadian judge has ever gone to jail or been charged for corruption in office but judicial corruption happens on a regular basis in Canada and Canadians appear to be taking direct action by murdering the offending judges.

Click here to read more about judicial murder in Canada.

The British Columbia Investment Management Corp., (BCIMC) that is behind the judicial corruption being used against the English family is now in deep financial crisis because international banks are increasingly looking at the criminal tactics and strategies employed by BCIMC and refusing to do business with an obvious criminal organization that loots private property, corrupts the local judiciary and rigs the court process.

Mr. English continues to believe that there are some judges in British Columbia who are honest and says he did receive a fair shake from Justice Groves and Justice Leask, recently, when he needed time to respond after suffering a head injury and he feels that Justice Betton, who decided against him in the Mission Creek foreclosure case, was intentionally misled by opposing legal counsel and his own legal counsel who were either grossly incompetent or intentional blind to the criminal conspiracy against him that has now been proved by this blog and the subsequent firings at BCIMC and BC Hydro when the stench of corruption from those British Columbia government agencies began reeking and leaking all over the internet.

Mr.  Carten, a retired lawyer from British Columbia who has been assisting Mr. English and his family, has published a number of blogs and web sites that document cases of judicial corruption in Canada, especially in British Columbia, the most notorious being the Water War Crimes web site that is visited regularly by the governments of British Columbia, several other provinces and, of course, Canada's federal government, including the RCMP.

Is The BC Government Rigging the Case Against John English At the British Columbia Court of Appeal?????

Justice Mary Saunders 

 British Columbia Court of Appeal Justice Mary Saunders, shown in photo on right, told a sick and ailing John English that he would not be permitted to use a qualified lawyer to present his case against BC lawyer Greg Harney who Mr. English claims tried to rip him off with a million dollar bill for less than 2 days in court and a few weeks of office time. 

In the Editors opinion, the highly unusual ruling proves that the British Columbia Court of Appeal continued to be threatened or blackmailed by the criminal gang inside the Government of British Columbia that is using the Harney case as a tool to complete the looting of the English family resort property near Tofino, B.C.

Click here to learn more about British Columbia lawyer Gregg Harney 

Elizabeth Bennett

John English has been under doctors care for a serious concussion sustained last fall and he has been advised not to appear in court until his health is better so, his long time family friend and fully qualified lawyer, John Frederick Carten, approached the court  and asked to present the legal arguments because Mr. English was not well. 

Mr. Carten also tendered to the court proof of Mr. English's serious medical condition that was verified by a written report from Dr. Susan O'Donnell of St. Paul's Hospital who had examined Mr. English as a result of a medical crisis earlier in the morning. 

Mr. Carten is a highly qualified lawyer who has appeared at all levels of court in Canada and he sometimes assists self represented litigants who cannot otherwise afford a lawyer

Click here to read more about Mr. Carten's work in Canada's justice system. 

Objections were also raised about the presence of Justice Elizabeth on the case because she is a former career civil servant in British Columbia whose pension plan is probably managed by the British Columbia Investment Management Corporation the company that was the beneficiary of the looting of the English family property by terrorist tactics. (see photo below of English family home burning )

 

Government terrorizes the English family.

Ms. Bennett has developed a reputation for being selected to preside on cases  involving  bureaucrats and politicians who are alleged to have committed crimes while in office in British Columbia. 

She was recently assigned to a case involving Mr. Carten where she made a highly questionable ruling and her assignment in that case is evidence of improper interference with the judiciary by the BC Government and corroborates Mr. English suspicion that the BC Government is manipulating the Court of Appeal against him. 

Ms. Bennett was involved in both the cover up of the alleged crimes of Premier Glen Clark and the cover up of the alleged crimes in the BC Rail scandal under the leadership of Premier Gordon Campbell. 

Based on her body language and demeanour in court on May 28, 2015, it is apparent that Ms. Bennett is under great stress that is consistent with criminal blackmail or other forms of threat or inducement.  

The court left Mr. English with no practical option but to risk his health and make a brief attendance to insure his appeal was not defeated by default. 

Judge Nicole Garson



The other judge on the case is Justice Nicole Garson who, like Saunders, Bennett and Chief Justice Bauman owes her position as a high paid Canadian judge (salary $250,000 plus per annum) to the corrupt regime of gangsters who worked for Prime Minister Jean Chretien - a regime that was widely known for corruption, judicial case fixing, and other crimes. According to the Court of Appeal Web Site, Garson (shown in photo on right) was appointed a supreme court judge on March 21, 2001 and a Court of Appeal Judge on May 14, 2009.    

A close examination of Garson's complexion in the recent photo on the right shows the tell tale signs of the Irish Curse, red coloured blotchy patches that form with the making of dishonest decisions, that killed former Canadian finance minister Jim Flaherty and that afflicts Elizabeth Bennett and Chief Justice Bauman.